- Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968), Dadaism: His piece, “Fountain” (1917), a porcelain urinal, was seen as a challenge to the conventional notion of what art is and provoked a great deal of controversy.
- Damien Hirst (1965- ), Young British Artists (YBA): Hirst’s piece “The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living” (1991) featured a shark preserved in formaldehyde and received criticism for its perceived lack of artistic merit.
- Pablo Picasso (1881-1973), Cubism: Picasso’s painting “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon” (1907) was considered shocking due to its distortion of the human form and rejection of traditional perspective.
- Jackson Pollock (1912-1956), Abstract Expressionism: Pollock’s “drip paintings,” such as “Number 1 (Lavender Mist)” (1950), were seen as chaotic and meaningless by some critics.
- Gustave Courbet (1819-1877), Realism: Courbet’s painting “The Origin of the World” (1866), a close-up of a woman’s genitals, was considered pornographic and scandalous.
- Edvard Munch (1863-1944), Expressionism: Munch’s painting “The Scream” (1893) was seen as disturbing and nihilistic, reflecting the anxieties of modern life.
- Francisco Goya (1746-1828), Romanticism: Goya’s “The Third of May 1808” (1814) depicted a Spanish firing squad executing citizens during the Napoleonic Wars, challenging traditional heroic portrayals of war.
- Kazimir Malevich (1878-1935), Suprematism: Malevich’s “Black Square” (1915) was criticized for its rejection of representation and perceived emptiness.
- Jeff Koons (1955- ), Contemporary Art: Koons’ work, such as his series of sculptures depicting Michael Jackson and his pet monkey, was seen as crass and exploitative.
- 10.Caravaggio (1571-1610), Baroque: Caravaggio’s violent and dramatic paintings, such as “Judith Beheading Holofernes” (1599-1602), were criticized for their graphic depictions of violence and lack of decorum.

đź’śđź’ś
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the Goya painting it was a French firing squad killing Spanish patriots.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Goes to demonstrating my point that history is recorded subjectively… there are always different “facts”. Different history books seem to have different facts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The French (Napoleonic forces) had laid a siege on Madrid and on the 2nd of May the citizens of Madrid revolted, the ones the French caught they put in front of their firing squads. There cannot be different facts from these.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not denying what you are saying, I’m simply stating that in my research there are often variations that appear in the reporting of stories and all the historians state those reports as facts. Ive come to accept that history may be factual, but the reporting of it seldom is without bias. To paraphrase both Mark Twain and Albert Einstein: Consider the moral of every story, and question everything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point. When researching, or even reading, consider the source…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting article showcasing some of the most controversial artworks from different art movements throughout history.
founder of balance thy life https://balancethylife.com
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the comment… in doing research for a book on art history, I’ve found so many subjective perspectives on what’s what, that every list I’ve compiled has become very amusing and intriguing… this list in particular… some of the pieces can appear in many other lists, including ones that talk about least disruptive artists… it really is all subjective… I believe Marcel Duchamp stated some truth when he suggested that only the artist can define what is art and where it fits into history… everyone else can only see through the lens of their life experiences.
LikeLike